The following editorial appeared in the Scranton Times-Tribune. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Tribune-Democrat.

Republicans who have controlled the state legislature for all but four of the past 27 years have been able to do so in part because of gerrymandering.

Several generations of GOP legislative leaders have firmly rejected the creation of a nonpartisan citizens’ commission to draw new electoral maps every 10 years, after each census.

In 2011, the Republican majority designed a map of legislative districts so battered that the state Supreme Court banned its use in the 2012 election.

The final map for the 2014 election — the current map — skews Republican by more than 8%, according to the nonpartisan, nonprofit Princeton Gerrymandering Project.

The proposed new map was produced by a commission made up of partisan Republican and Democratic legislative caucus leaders and a court-appointed independent chair, former University of Pittsburgh chancellor Mark Nordenberg — the key player.

According to the Princeton group, this would reduce the GOP advantage to 1.2%.

Cynically playing on the public’s preference for an independent commission, Republican legislative leaders concocted a constitutional amendment to create a fake one.

Only the legislative majority would appoint the members of a “citizens’ commission”, but this majority would retain the right to reject the commission’s work and adopt its own map. Attacking the judiciary, the amendment also requires that if the Supreme Court invalidates a card, the legislative majority would draw a replacement.

Republican State Rep. Seth Grove of York County, the sponsor, said: ‘We will have … the final check to make sure there is no fraud at the end of the day’ , apparently guaranteeing fraud at the start of the day.

“It’s a power grab disguised as reform,” said Michael Li, a redistricting expert at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice.

To underscore this, the amendment would require districts to be redrawn immediately if voters approve it. This means that the legislative majority itself would redraw the districts for 2024, rather than after the 2030 census.

And, of course, the cynics aim to place the measure on the 2023 primary ballot, to take advantage of the typical low turnout in an off-year primary to preserve minority rule.

Pennsylvanians have a habit of rubber-stamping amendments. If he makes it to the ballot, they must reject him to prevent Pennsylvania from replacing representative democracy with cynicism as a form of government.


SA Test series defeat: A lesson in form, class and its 'permanence'


Postgame Report: Grizzlies fall to Mavericks, franchise-record winning streak ends at 11 games

Check Also